  |
- Incidents of targeted violence at school were rarely
sudden, impulsive acts.
- Prior to most incidents, other people knew about
the attacker's plan.
- Most attackers did not directly threaten their targets
prior to advancing the attack.
- There is no accurate or useful profile of students
who engage in targeted school violence.
- Most attackers engaged in some behavior prior to
the incident that caused others concern or indicated
a need for help.
- Most attackers had difficulty coping with significant
losses or personal failure. Many had considered or
attempted suicide.
- Many attackers felt bullied, persecuted, or injured
by others prior to the attack.
- Most attackers had access to and had used weapons
prior to the attack. w In many cases, other students
were involved in some capacity.
- Despite prompt law enforcement responses, most shootings
were stopped by means other than law enforcement intervention.
|
| |
|
|
|
Targeted school violencea situation in which
a school has purposefully been selected as the site of a violent,
pre-planned attackis rare. Nonetheless, an event of this nature
affects every community in some way. It interrupts teaching and
learning. It erodes confidence in public education. It creates fear
in the hearts of students, staff, and community. For these reasons,
it is important to be preparedto develop a threat assessment process
that involves the school community, as well as law enforcement,
mental health providers, and other local stakeholders.
Since June of 1999, the U.S. Department of Education
and the U.S. Secret Service have been working as a team to try to
better understandand ultimately help preventschool shootings
in America. The Safe School Initiative has been a collaborative
effort drawing from the Secret Service's experience in studying
and preventing assassinations and other types of targeted violence,
and the Department of Education's expertise in helping schools facilitate
learning through the creation of safe environments for students,
faculty, and staff.
The Safe School Initiative has included an extensive
examination of 37 incidents of targeted school shootings and school
attacks that have occurred in schools in the United States, beginning
with the earliest identified incident in 1974 through June of 2000.
The purpose of the study has been to examine the thinking, planning,
and other behaviors of students who have carried out school attacks.
Throughout the collaboration, the two agencies have focused on one
common goal: to develop accurate and useful information about prior
school attacks that could help prevent some future incidents.
In the summer of 2002, the U.S. Department of
Education and the U.S. Secret Service presented the findings of
the Safe School Initiative at 12 daylong trainings in six cities
nationwide (see Key Findings, left). They also distributed copies
of their recent publication, Threat Assessment in Schools: A
Guide to Managing Threatening Situations and to Creating Safe School
Climates, to some 3,000 educators, law enforcement officials,
and mental health providers gathered at the trainings. Distributing
the Guide to local communities is essential, because one of its
main purposes is to help "real people" with "real
jobs"that is, the Guide is intended to provide school and
law enforcement officials practical guidance in preventing targeted
school violence and in identifying, assessing, and managing students
who may pose a risk for targeted violence in schools.
According to the Guide, effective threat assessment
can only occur in the larger context of school safetythreat assessment
must be linked to existing school safety plans, not seen as just
"one more thing to do." Following are some key points
of the guide.
Establishing an Integrated Approach
Threat assessment is a complex process that
requires a team commitment, prior planning, and lots of practice.
One person, or even one office, cannot do it alone. That is why
an effective threat assessment is based on an integrated systems
approach. In this approach, key stakeholders come together to establish
protocols and procedures, and to identify existing and needed resources
for both the students of concern* (see next page) and the whole
school community. These key players discuss, plan, and agree on
what should take place if and when a situation arises. This kind
of planning is at the core of a successful threat assessment processÑensuring
that decisions and plans are in place and that specific individuals
have been delegated the authority to conduct assessments and share
information if the need arises.
<continued
on the next page: Creating a Climate of Safety>
|
|