|
The Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools (OSDFS) is seeking grant
application reviewers who have expertise in drug abuse prevention,
violence prevention, and other subject areas relevant to OSDFS discretionary
grant programs.
Reviewers play a significant role in the grant
application process. They read and score applications against the
selection criteria published in the Federal Register to determine
that the applications meet all of the program requirements.
Who Are Peer Reviewers?
Peer reviewers are people just like you. A qualified
peer reviewer is someone who has relevant education, training, or
experience in the subject area of the grant competition; exhibits
a basic knowledge of common computer functions; has access to the
Internet;
can successfully complete a Web-based training course; and will
commit the time necessary to complete the review on schedule.
There are many benefits to serving as a reviewer.
Reviewers receive a modest honorarium for completing their work
in its entirety. They also gain valuable insight into the federal
grant review process and the strategies and methods ED uses to determine
awarded grants.
What Do Peer Reviewers Do?
Each reviewer is assigned to a panel to read
and score a group of assigned applications. They read and evaluate
up to 12 applications each, score them based on the extent to which
the applicant addresses each selection criterion and accompanying
subelement, post their scores and comments on a secure online system,
and participate in three conference calls over an 8-10 day period.
Most reviewers spend approximately three hours per day on any given
review.
The federal grant team monitoring the competition
then conducts an internal review to ensure that the reviewers' scoring
sheets are correctly completed and that comments support assigned
scores, and to verify that the applications meet all the requirements
of the program.
In FY 2003, OSDFS recruited 364 different peer
reviewers from all 50 states for 9 grant competitions. Some reviewers
reviewed for more than one competition.
How Are Peer Reviewers Selected?
Peer reviewers are selected on the basis of
their experience in designated program areas. A peer reviewer is
expected to draw upon his or her expertise in evaluating applications
according to published selection criteria.
In addition, a reviewer is expected to complete an online training
and confirm his or her ability to:
- provide a specific and well-documented evaluation
of each application;
- prepare constructive written comments that
are clear and easy to understand;
- evaluate applications independently of any
personal feelings or knowledge he or she may have about an applicant;
- maintain confidentiality;
- participate in panel discussions on each
application via telephone;
- report any conflict of interest; and
- review applications solely on the basis of
the selection criteria published in the Federal Register.
How Can You Become a Peer Reviewer?
To become a peer reviewer for OSDFS, you must
first register online at www.osdfspeerreview.org.
Click on the New Reviewer Registration link on the right side of
the page. Complete all required fields and submit a resume online.
You also will be able to identify specific grant competitions in
which you are interested. While it will be several months before
any reviews are scheduled, recruiting takes place year round.
If you have additional questions, please e-mail
the peer review support team at:
customerservice@esi-dc.com.
|