  |
- Help students get to know each other’s
(and your) strengths.
- Involve students in planning, problem solving,
identifying issues, and assessing curriculum in the
classroom.
- Promote cooperation over competition. Post everyone's
best work. Offer opportunities for the class to work
together to help everyone achieve their
level of excellence.
- Build a strong relationship with
each student.
- Involve all students
in chores and responsibilities in the classroom.
- Convey attentiveness to students and excitement
about learning through nonverbal gestures.
- Integrate concepts of discipline and respect for
classmates through instruction.
- Give students more say in what they
will learn.
- Involve students in developing the criteria by
which their work will be assessed and provide guidelines
so they clearly
understand what's expected of them.
- Use inclusive “we” language when presenting
classroom activities (we, us, let’s).
Additional Resources
Blum, R.W., McNeely, C.A.,
Rinehart, P.M. Improving the Odds: The Untapped
Power of Schools to Improve the Health of Teens. Center
for Adolescent Health and Development, University of
Minnesota; 2002. (For copies, e-mail the Center
for Adolescent Health at ph@umn.edu.)
McNeely, C.A., Nonnemaker,
J.M., Blum, R.W. Promoting Student Connectedness
to School: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study
of Adolescent Health. Journal of School Health,
Vol. 72 (4); 2002.
|
| |
|
|
|
The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent
Health (Add Health) shows a strong association between school connectedness
and a variety of risk factors, researchers say. A Congressionally
mandated, Federally funded study, Add Health is the largest, most
comprehensive survey of adolescents ever undertaken in the United
States.
Researchers from the University
of Minnesota analyzed data from the study and found that students
who feel connected to school are less likely to use substances,
engage in violent behavior, experience emotional distress, or become
pregnant.
In the study, school connectedness
was defined as students’ positive answers to questions regarding
whether they feel close to people at school, feel part of school,
feel safe at school, and feel that teachers treat students fairly.
Robert Blum, professor and director
of Minnesota's Adolescent Health Program and a study co-investigator,
explained that he and his colleagues set out to discover what contributed
to teens feeling connected to their school. Why do some adolescents
feel attached to school while others don’t? What individual
and school characteristics predict connectedness?
When looking at factors that affected
school connectedness, researchers found that school size mattered,
but classroom size did not. In addition, the location of the school
(rural, suburban, urban); the type of school (public, private, parochial);
and the number of years of the teachers’ experience also were
not factors in whether a student felt connected to his or her school.
The single strongest factor associated
with school connectedness was school climate. Well-managed schools
and classrooms where expectations for individual responsibility
are clear, teachers consistently acknowledge all students, and students
are actively involved in classroom management fostered school connectedness.
In addition, students with social
groups that were integrated (by both gender and race) had higher
school connectedness. This was particularly true when social integration
was structured and supported by the school.
“What goes on in the classroom
is key to keeping kids from becoming disenchanted with school,”
said Blum. “It doesn’t matter whether you have 20 or
30 kids in a class. It doesn’t matter whether the teacher
has a graduate degree. What matters is the environment that a student
enters when he walks through the classroom door.
“Do students treat each other
with respect? Do they get along well with the teacher? Do they pay
attention in class and complete their assignments on time? These
are the important questions.”
The study’s analysis of school
connectedness is based on written surveys filled out during the
1994-95 academic year by 71,515 students in 127 schools. In addition,
administrators at participating schools completed questionnaires
about school policies and procedures, teacher characteristics, and
student body characteristics. Future analysis of Add Health survey
data will address questions about how families, schools, peers,
and communities affect adolescent behavior and health.
Robert Blum is professor and director of the Center
of Adolescent Health and Development, University of Minnesota. This
article is based on his presentation, “Promoting Student Connectedness
to School: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent
Health,” at the 2002 National Technical Assistance Meeting,
Washington, DC.
|
|